Rossitza ATANASSOVA Art and
Idolatry in Prudentius.
In this paper I present a reading of the Contra Orationem Symmachi
1-2 as a set of political poems, reflecting the imperial position
about the old forms of worship in the pagan-Christian conflict, and
Prudentius anxiety about the artistic value of the pagan
monuments and works of art, by divorcing it from its pagan
significance. Having accepted the historical relevance of these
poems, I argue that Prudentius used the panegyric themes of Christian
imperial legislation and military victories by Christs will to
express the anxiety of the Christian circles about the symbols of
paganism.
For this purpose, the First Book highlights the laws of Theodosius
(391 AD) and his dynasty (CTh 16, 10, 15 of 399 AD) that
forbade pagan sacrifices but sanctified the preservation as State
ornaments of pagan temples and works of religious art. Then, this
official position is contrasted with the condemnation to destruction
of the representation in statues of the pagan gods that, in the
Second Book, introduces the debate about whether Victory should be
worshipped at her Altar in the Senate house. As an explanation for
the ambivalence of the Imperial policy against paganism, I introduce
other anti-pagan laws, such as that of 399 De idolis
deponendis (CTh. 16, 10, 18) and I use some relevant
passages from St. Augustines Epistles (29, 50, 91, 232)
and Sermon 62 as the evidence for the role that the Church
played in the pagan-Christian conflict. Next, I elucidate
Prudentius view on the subject of pagan art, by maintaining
that the diatribe against the statue of Victory served the purpose of
proclaiming Romes Christian victories and, more specifically,
the triumph over the Goths in 402. Finally, I will use as further
evidence Peristephanon 10 to maintain that, by attacking the
artificiality of the pagan religious beliefs and by ridiculing these
forms of worship, the poet aims to distinguish between idolatry and
art as such, and to free these from all the stains of pagan
superstitions.