| 2001-2002 | 2000-2001 | 1999-2002 Means | |||
| Institution | Avg. # of Interviews | Institution | Avg. # of Interviews | Institution | Avg. # of Interviews |
| USC | 10.00 | Harvard | 6.60 | USC | 5.94 |
| Rutgers | 10.00 | UCLA | 6.00 | Pennsylvania | 5.45 |
| UC Berkeley | 7.80 | IlIinois-Urbana | 5.00 | UCLA | 5.42 |
| UCLA | 7.30 | USC | 4.50 | Harvard | 5.08 |
| Michigan | 6.80 | Bryn Mawr | 4.40 | UC Berkeley | 4.74 |
| Pennsylvania | 6.70 | Pennsylvania | 4.30 | UNC | 4.68 |
| UNC | 6.60 | Wisconsin | 4.00 | Texas | 4.67 |
| Minnesota | 6.33 | Chicago | 3.50 | Michigan | 4.52 |
| Yale | 6.25 | Cincinnati | 3.50 | IlIinois-Urbana | 4.50 |
| Texas | 6.00 | Washington | 3.50 | Chicago | 4.46 |
| Top 15 Institutions by # of 2002-2003 Positions Obtained by Candidates at Meeting | Top 10 Institutions by % of Candidates at Meeting with 2002-2003 Positions | ||
| Yale | 8 | Virginia | 100% |
| UNC | 7 | IlIinois-Urbana | 75% |
| UC Berkeley | 7 | Johns Hopkins | 67% |
| Texas | 6 | Loyola -Chicago | 67% |
| Pennsylvania* | 6 | Texas | 67% |
| Princeton | 5 | USC | 67% |
| Michigan | 4 | Wisconsin | 67% |
| Harvard | 4 | UNC | 64% |
| Toronto | 3 | Yale | 53% |
| Columbia | 3 | 9 other institutions** | 50% |
| IlIinois-Urbana | 3 | ||
| Chicago | 3 | ||
| Oxford | 3 | ||
| Brown | 3 | ||
| Stanford* | 3 | ||
*Note: Adding candidates not at the meeting with 02-03 positions
would give Pennsylvania 7 and Stanford 5.
**British Columbia, Colorado,
Indiana, Iowa, NYU, Rutgers, SUNY Buffalo, Toronto, UC Berkeley.
Source: 2001-2002 APA Placement Statistics
Close this window when finished.