Table 20B
Respondents' Reporting of Guideline
Violations
| Reports of
Guideline Violations |
| |
Females |
Males |
Totals |
| Saw no violatons |
28 |
38 |
66 |
| No |
8 |
13 |
21 |
| No response |
18 |
22 |
40 |
| Totals |
54 |
73 |
127 |
| |
| Reasons for not
Reporting Guideline Violations |
| |
Females |
Males |
Totals |
| Did not know how to |
1 |
2 |
3 |
| Lack of faith in the
process |
1 |
2 |
3 |
| Personal indifference |
2 |
3 |
5 |
| Other* |
4 |
2 |
6 |
| No Response |
|
4 |
4 |
| Totals |
8 |
13 |
21 |
*Other reasons specified:
- “I am not sure what exactly was going on.”
- “Questions seemed reasonable given nature of
institution.”
- “Interviewer knows me and my spouse felt it wasn't
wrong.”
- “Did not seem significant enough nor applicable to general
candidate pool.”
- “I thought my age was a logical topic of discussion since I
applied for an AP post.”
- “Comments were made about the religious and political climate
of the school, but I was not asked to say what my own religion or political
orientation was. As for the Gender comment - that comment was made after the
convention interview.”
Source: 2002-2003 Professional Matters Survey of Placement
Candidates
Close this window when finished.